X 6 ? Tain... 039 039 039

et pendant ce temps la ...

Citation:

General Motors compte emprunter 1,5 milliard de dollars CHICAGO (Reuters) - General Motors a annoncé lundi qu'il comptait lever 1,5 milliard de dollars par l'emprunt d'ici la fin de l'année pour développer sa position de liquidité et tirer parti de conditions de marché solides. Les prêteurs seront créanciers prioritaires sur les machines et l'équipement des sites industriels du groupe automobile. Les changements des règles comptables gouvernant les retraites et autres prestations sociales post-emploi pourraient déboucher sur des fonds propres négatifs dans les comptes financiers de la fin de l'année 2006, rendant difficile de placer les actifs immobilisés en garantie d'une telle facilité l'an prochain, a expliqué le constructeur automobile américain.

_________________
Que le Gold vous protége !! Y a que la vérité qui compte

un truc "marrant " sur Paulson et la "filiere" chinoise
qui met un relief singulier sur le conflit d'interet entre sa position au tresor et le role determinant sinon exclusif qu'il a joué ds l'émergence des rel d'affaires Gsachs / chine pop


source midas

More from Scott:

Hello Gentlemen:
I did a Google search using the key words: Paulson China, and the first article that came up raised some interesting questions. I am not familiar with this writer except that I checked him out on Wikipedia and was surprised he was so critical of Paulson in light of his past associations. In any case, I think the article is worth a read on a day that CNBC is talking about IBM investing in Chinese banks.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=
YTFmYjBmMzZkOTc0YTYwM2I4YTZlODFlYTRmZTdkYjA=

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Gaffney%2C_Jr

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Best wishes,
Scott

ça se corse ++++ , cet eclairage chine / Goldman suchs !!!!

et le pire c'est que 7 super crédible !!!

un lecteur de midas

Cause and effect?


Bill
After years of working as an engineer some habits are just too hard to break. One of those habits is to look around for cause and effect, especially if you are in new territory. A few facts published lately kind of make sense when viewed together.

1. The US is exporting gold at a rate not seen since Nixon closed the gold window in the early 70s.

2. China has been reported to have, and has now announced, the policy of diversifying its FOREX reserves.

3. Most believe that the diversification of China's reserves will include gold. China % of gold reserves is much lower than many industrialized nations.

4. Goldscum Sacks is a HUGE financial entity that has been doing numerous IPOs, purchases, etc in China for years. They have weaseled themselves into China's political elite and financial markets. (Sounds familiar doesn't it?)

5. Paulson has made many trips to China and seems to have a cozy relationship with the central dictatorial figures who control all of China's macro financial decisions. They seem to have established a private arrangement with the controllers of China.

6. Goldscum Sacks operates in its own interests, not those of the people of the US. This is obvious by the blatant manipulation that we see them doing on a regular basis even in this non-transparent environment.

7. Tonnes of physical gold is necessary to support the manipulative shorting by goldscum and associates.

8. We see that goldscum has some kind of wink wink nod nod get out of jail free card with the Us government that allows them to flaunt the laws are regulations that they seem to violate with impunity.

One scenario that fits the above is obvious. That scenario being that goldscum is orchestrating a transfer of US and European gold to China. They are keeping the price down, that is obvious. They are using gold from US and cooperative entities most likely including the CBs that are bullied by and cooperating with the US puppet masters. Neither China or goldscum operate in the light of day and the cozy relationship goldscum has with the US govt, may be the model for the relationship with China's ruling elite.

Could the intentional transfer of peoples gold to China, at very low manipulated prices, be a quid pro quo between China and goldscum at the expence of free markets and small investors all over the world?

Will be interesting to see if other little factiods evolve to support this contention.

BC BN
Scruffy