|
| | Réserves d'or des banques centrales / statistiques annuelles |  |
| |
| Message | Auteur |
|---|
 et toujours de gros doutes sur les stocks d'or réels des banques centrales
par marie Lun 5 Déc 2011 - 15:47 | |
| qu'en est t'il des stocks d'or réels des banques centrales occidentales?usa, allemagne, fmi, italie ou même le stock d'or de GLD gardienné par HSBC un résumé détaillé de la situation chez Bill Murphy - Citation :
-
Alors que je parcours le web à la recherche de nouvelles informations quant à la suppression du prix de l’or, mon regard est attiré par un crescendo de références aux théories et recherches du GATA. Le GATA a estimé au bas mot que 15000 tonnes d’or aient quitté les coffres des banques centrales au cours de ces 15 dernières années afin d’entrer sur le marché et de contribuer à la suppression du prix de l’or physique.
De quoi parle donc le GATA ? Pour tout nouvel arrivant n’ayant pas encore de connaissance approfondie quant aux actions et recherches du GATA, en voici un bref récapitulatif :
Les réserves d’or des Etats-Unis, s’élevant à 8133 tonnes au total, n’ont pas été aperçues depuis maintenant 60 ans. Le meilleur scénario que l’on puisse imaginer est que la plupart de cet or ait depuis longtemps été injecté sur le marché. Le pire scénario que l’on puisse imaginer est que ces réserves d’or soient grevées, c’est-à-dire que le montant des réserves d’or des Etats-Unis soit substantiellement négatif. Toute personne s’imaginant qu’elle possède personnellement de l’or physique simplement parce qu’elle a accès à des documents écrits la liant à de l’or dont la présence dans les coffres d’un dépositaire Américain n’a pas été auditée est tout bonnement stupide.
GLD a récemment déclaré posséder 1104 tonnes d’or. Même le plus naïf des commentateurs de marché ne pense pas que ne serait-ce que la moitié de ces réserves d’or soient présentes dans quelque coffre que ce soit. Il n’existe aucun audit indépendant permettant de prouver de l’existence de cet or physique. Il est surprenant de voir à quel point les standards de contrôle devant normalement être appliqués à la possession d’or sont passés outre lorsque le cartel des banques centrales est impliqué.
Le pire des scénarios serait que le système de réserve fractionnaire ait été mis en application bien trop souvent, et qu’à chaque fois que Bernanke, Geitner ou Summers avait besoin de réserves immédiates d’or physique, les réserves décroissantes de GLD aient été utilisées. Qui peut confirmer formellement que l’or physique détenu par GLD ne soit pas de moins de 5% des quantités qui devraient être présentes dans leurs coffres selon leur propre manifeste? Les investisseurs les plus naïfs sont ceux qui pensent que les actions GLD peuvent être converties en or physique si un phénomène de ‘panique’ venait à survenir.
pour lire la suite   Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | décembre 2011
par marie Lun 26 Déc 2011 - 15:04 | |
| statistiques WGC des réserves d'or pour décembre 2011  Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | rappatriation de l'or européen / Jim Sinclair
par marie Ven 20 Jan 2012 - 17:11 | |
| très interessante interview de Jim Sinclair sur KWN, au sujet des réserves d'or européennes, stockées aux USA. Chavez aurait crée un précédent, en rappatriant l'or vénézuelien, sur le sol national, l'attention des médias commence à se focaliser sur cet épineux dossier, et Sinclair pense que d'autres demandes de rappatriement suivront, que la FED ne pourra pas différer éternellement, faute de quoi, elle en aurait d'avantage encore ( le refus créant d'avantage d'inquiétude chez les demandeurs, il serait très contreproductif de laisser planer le doute ) Evidemment, on pense surtout à l'allemagne, mais les candidats européens ne manquent pas Sinclair exclue par ailleurs, toute vente d'or supplémentaire, du FMI http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/1/19_Jim_Sinclair_-_There_Will_Be_a_Run_on_Gold_Stored_in_the_US.html Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | réserves mondiales officielles aout 2012
par marie Dim 9 Sep 2012 - 2:28 | |
| pour les amateurs des stats officielles, dont on sait bien ce qu'elles valent tableau incomplet, trouvé au hasard d'un article ZH qui montre une fois de plus à quel point ces statistiques sont bidons ... et commentées ici
- tant pour les BC occidentales qui gonflent leurs réserves d'or - que pour les BC "orientales" qui les sousestiment ... pour le moment, et tant que c'est leur intérêt ( quand elles auront terminé leurs emplettes à bon compte , ce sera une autre chanson ! )  en comparant avec les dernières stats oficielles de déc 2011 aucun changement sur les 20 premières réserves d'or mondiales sauf pour - russie qui passe de 871 à 918 tonnes d'or - vénézuela qui passe de 372 à 365.80 tonnes d'or stats à mettre en relation avec notre file dédiée aux achats d'or des banques centrales "orientales" ...de ce qu'elles veulent bien laisser filtrer, évidement http://www.hardinvestor.net/t12373p30-achats-d-or-par-les-banques-centrales-s-accelerent Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | réserves d'or des BC occidentales / combien en détiennent t'elles donc réellement?
par marie Lun 22 Oct 2012 - 17:56 | |
| réserves d'or des BC occidentales / combien en détiennent t'elles donc réellement?c'est une question que l'on souléve depuis longtemps ici, et cette dernière étude de Sprott a le mérite de faire un point complet sur le sujet le tableau B est particulièrement interessant, puisqu'il décrit précisément les quantités d'or détenues par les BC occidentales, mais sutout sous quelle forme, cet or est détenu : physique, loan ( préts ) et swaps ( échanges d'or avec une autre BC) sur les 23.000 tonnes prétendument détenues, près de 19.000 tonnes sont susceptibles d'avoir été prétées, échangées et même vendues. de plus et amah, l'or du FMI ( 2814 tonnes ) soit disant comptabilisé sous forme de physique représente egalement une double comptabilité, puisque cet or n'est qu'une créance sur les états membres, qui peuvent donc également le comptabiliser dans leurs réserves . http://www.sprott.com/media/192449/maag-0912-do-western-central-banks-have-any-gold-left.pdfpour ceux qui ne comprennent pas le tour de passe passe de l'or échangé puis vendu, mais tjs officiellement en coffre des BC occidentalesje vous invite à lire ou relire ce sketch d'Adrian Douglas, traduit en français par mes soins http://www.hardinvestor.net/t10821-hedging-swaps-reserves-or-du-fmi-et-autres-tragies-comedies#36339en complément Alasdair Macleod revient plus en détail sur le mécanisme de transfert des réserves d'or des BC de l'ouest vers celles de l'est lire l'article ********** ce papier tombe à pic, au moment où l'on apprend que la cour de justice allemande demande un audit de ses réserves, et demande donc des comptes aux pays qui gardiennent ses réserves ( principalement les usa, mais aussi la GB et la france ) http://www.hardinvestor.net/t2657p15-reserves-d-or-de-la-bundesbank-banque-centrale-allemande#50560 Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | 46% de réserves physiques en moins ds les coffres des BC
par marie Lun 29 Oct 2012 - 20:00 | |
| En marge des news sur l'or de la bundesbank, James Turk, revient sur la double comptabilité de l'or par les BC, et montre que 46% des réserves comptabilisées ont été prétées ou échangées, et ne sont donc plus dans les coffres, soit environ 15.000 tonnes d'or, évaporées.( enfin ... pas pour tout le monde, évidemment ==> voir la chine et les BRICS) (on le dit depuis très longtemps ici, mais ça vaut le coup de le redire, avec la démonstration compléte )
sur les 32791 tonnes officiellement détenues par les BC, il n'en reste donc que 17291 de réelles . et pour en revenir au pb de la couverture de la masse monétaire, la comparaison avec 1945 est intéressante : - Citation :
-
In 1945, 68% of the world's gold was in central bank vaults, and the total quantity of money, i.e., national currency in circulation, was about $300 billion. Today the total quantity of national currency is about $30 trillion, a one hundred-fold increase in 57 years compounded at an 8.4% annual growth rate. And central banks hold in their vaults some 17,291 tonnes of gold, which is just 40% of the weight they held in 1945 and only 11.9% of today's aboveground gold stock.
Clearly, these numbers show that today's monetary system is out-of-whack, that the money-substitutes produced by central banks have become too excessive and therefore overvalued against money itself, i.e., gold. The central banks and the fiat national currency they produce are therefore vulnerable. After decades of abusive policies undermining the purchasing power of those national currencies, the central banks are running out of gold, their most valuable and powerful asset.
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/10/29_Turk_-_15%2C000_Tons_Of_Western_Central_Bank_Gold_Is_Gone.html Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | 160 X moins !!!
par g.sandro Mar 30 Oct 2012 - 0:16 | |
| Silver is king, Go Gold !
G.Sandro pas de copier collé: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | re / or des BC occidentales refondu chez raffineurs Honk hongs
par g.sandro Mer 10 Juil 2013 - 20:13 | |
| Énorme, même si, ici, on l'a toujours redouté; le fait de le lire d'un témoin direct est une gourmandise authentique... Alors? Paranos les Hardins?   Silver is king, Go Gold !
G.Sandro pas de copier collé: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | re / or des BC occidentales refondu chez raffineur Honk hong : Heraeus
par marie Mer 17 Juil 2013 - 23:28 | |
| Or des Bc occidentales refondu à Honk Hong : HeraeusSuite au témoignage de William Kayes et révélations d'un raffineur sur l'origine de l'or qu'il reçoit à fondre, le journaliste allemand Lars Schall a voulu "valider" et en savoir d'avantage... notamment, bien évidemment sur l'identité du raffineur qui avait fait de telles révélations : Il s'agit de l'entreprise allemande Heraeus, qui posséde une raffinerie à Honk Hong, et dont William Kayes est l'un des clients Voici la retranscription compléte de l'interview audio de W.Kayes par Lars Schall, résumée dans cette note du Gata http://www.gata.org/node/12798 On va bien rigoler ...Maintenant qu'il est cité, Heraeus va t'il se sentir obligé / sommé de publier un démenti? ********************* - Citation :
- LARS SCHALL: Hello, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Lars Schall and I am now connected with the founder, vice chairman, and senior managing director of the Pacific Alliance Group of Companies in Hong Kong, William S. Kaye. Hello, Mr. Kaye.
WILLIAM KAYE: Yes, Lars. How are you?
SCHALL: I am doing very well. How are you?
KAYE: I am doing well.
SCHALL: OK, great. Recently you received quite some attention related to some statements that you made to King World News. Can you tell us a little bit about this topic, because I was obviously quite confused.
KAYE: I think for people who are confused the best solution is to go to King World News and actually listen for yourself to the interview and read the written blogs as well. I think they faithfully represent the commentary:
http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2013/7/9_Gam...
I am a bit surprised at the attention that all this is getting, probably because to me it seems such an obvious state of the world. But it is causing a lot of excitement in the same sense that Ed Snowden revealing alleged secrets, and I didn't find anything that was revealed by WikiLeaks that I regarded as surprising. We expect the spying by the National Security Agency and so forth. I mean, that was all out there for people who were paying attention.
And I guess you could by analogy say the same thing about gold because there is a lot of factual information. For people who are interested in facts, and we are -- we are not conspiracy theorists -- when facts lead to conspiracies as an explanation, then we are open to that possibility as an explanation. And conspiracies do exist. As it relates to the interview itself, I think what caused the greatest controversy -- and it was puzzling to me -- was a statement that I made because our firm runs physical bullion itself. We have 1.1 metric tons stored safely at the Hong Kong International Airport. I made the statement that I deal with one of the biggest refineries here in Hong Kong.
It is a German company, by the way, Lars, by the name of Heraeus, which is headquartered right outside of Frankfurt. And based on being one of their best customers -- at least currently -- we were able to have discussions that would not be possible if that were not the case. One of those discussions evolved by asking out of curiosity where they got their gold from. Their response was “from all over, from everywhere, from all available sources.” And I said, “You mean recyclers, bullion banks, inventory from the Comex as well as central banks?” And they just acted surprised at that question and thought that was pretty idiotic and said, “We repeat -- we get it from all sources.”
They went on to confirm that they obviously had to mean central banks as well, though they would not identify any specific central bank. But they obviously were incorporating central banks in that statement because they added that they have to be able to get gold from central banks because central banks are the largest players in the industry, which is of course a fact.
So all I did was corroborate what are known facts, what I think is certainly known to people who are in the industry. But when you report it to the vast numbers of people who know little or nothing about the gold industry, it shakes them up.
SCHALL: I think people understood [from your interview] that German central bank gold that is stored at the New York Fed ends up in Hong Kong.
KAYE: I didn't say that. I just want to be very clear that I did not say that.
SCHALL: What are your thoughts in general related to the German gold?
KAYE: Well, here I am inferring, OK? So far I think we have dealt with facts. Now I am going to make an inference, which I think follows thoroughly and logically from those facts. But it is still an inference, OK? So I am trying to be as clear as I can.
I am inferring because all the facts point in this direction that there is little or no available "eligible" gold -- and I will return to what "eligible" means in a moment -- but there is little or no eligible gold left along the major Western central banks. The way I arrive at that is quite simple. The big smash on gold, which commenced on April 12 and has continued ever since -- the catalyst for that was the default by a major European bullion bank, ABN Amro, on their obligation to supply gold under contracts they had issued to their customers. They sent out effectively a "force majeure" in which they informed their client base that held their paper, which had been redeemable for gold on demand. They sent out a circular saying, "We no longer will allow you to redeem for gold on demand. You must redeem for cash. So whatever the paper price for gold is, you will get that price. Just tell us what currency you want it in."
So that was effectively a default. That was the first major bullion bank to engage in "force majeure."
Now this should have incited a buying panic. But it didn't. And the reason it didn't is that very quickly in the aftermath of this default, which received very little attention in the mainstream media, the smash on gold, the manipulation of paper gold, began in earnest.
Now again I am making an inference. I want to be clear: My strong belief is that the purpose of this raid was to preclude the likelihood that all the major bullion banks would have followed in ABN Amro's footsteps. This is important, because we do have a lot of corroborating evidence that it wasn't just ABN Amro that was running on empty as it related to gold inventories, and if you actually checked the data that it is publicly available, JP Morgan has record modern-era lows of gold inventories that they record in their warehouse versus the massive claims against that gold.
Similarly the Comex is running close to empty at the moment as well against massive paper claims that are outstanding on its gold.
So essentially gold inventory in the system that would be available to the bullion banks is running very close to empty. That was the case in mid-April and it continues to be the case today. Then the question becomes -- and all this is covered in the King World News interviews I have done as well as on the accompanying blogs -- What is when the essential feedstock that has allowed the prosecution of this manipulation and has been diluting of the exchange-traded funds, the largest of which by a factor is the SPDR Gold Trust, GLD on the New York Stock Exchange?
What is interesting about all that is the way these exchange-traded funds were set up by the banks themselves. In other words the exchange-traded funds were designed by the bullion banks to serve their purposes as any number of insiders, including a good friend of mine, who is a lawyer who wrote the language for several of these exchange-traded funds, have confirmed is exactly the case.
The setup is a highly unusual one for people who are not familiar with this industry. And that is that the only people who can legally deal, exclusively deal with the trusts themselves are 14 or 15 major bullion banks. That's it. So even if you had a billion dollars' worth of gold, or at least paper gold, held in certificates of GLD, you would not be able to redeem those shares yourself for physical gold. You would have to enlist the cooperation -- and they are entitled to either give it to you or not -- of one of the eligible major bullion banks like JP Morgan or Scotia Mocatta or whatever.
So the structure lends itself to enormous potential mischief and abuse and this is exactly what we are seeing, particularly since mid-April.
This gold trust has itself lost over 30 per cent of the gold it had at the beginning of 2013 alone. Gold has trended from the bullion banks, where it is held by HSBC in London, to places like here in Hong Kong -- I am sure I have some of that gold -- as well as places like the People's Bank of China in Beijing and importantly also to the Shanghai Gold Exchange, where we have seen extremely high and elevated buy-ins in recent weeks and months.
This is really what in a microcosm is happening, and for you listeners who cannot be bothered looking into the King World News site, the way it works is, the Fed and Bank for International Settlements, I strongly suspect, have to be involved. Again I am making an inference based on the notion that the bullion banks neither have the wherewithal financially, and even if they did they would be in violation of various rules, including the capital rules and maximum open position rules.
There has to be somebody else involved. And the only somebody else that checks all the boxes and would also have a strategic motive to want to be involved would be a major central bank like the Fed, probably acting in concert with the central bank to the central banks, the BIS.
So the conclusion we draw, because we feel that it is the only conclusion that can be drawn, is that the Fed and probably the BIS are backstopping this. The agents that are responsible for the actual design of the trading programs, the algorithms and the price-depression schemes, are the bullion banks themselves.
Now the reason all this kind of ties together and makes sense is that it's a win for both sides. The Fed and BIS benefit for sustaining for a bit longer the mythology that "quantitative easing" is responsible policy and that fiat currencies are strong. If gold would go in the other direction, hitting all-time highs, which in our estimation it would be, absent this manipulation scheme, this would disrupt the emperor. This would show that fiat currencies are suspect, that these policies are suspect, and interest rates, typical sovereign debt, would likely be much higher.
If people saw themselves losing purchasing power and saw gold skyrocket, there would be very little interest in the sovereign bonds of all these countries that if they didn't have digital printing presses backstopping them would all be bankrupt. So you can see why the Fed and the BIS would have a strategic agenda in engaging a scheme like this, and the bullion banks are engaging in the scheme for two reasons: First, the alternative is that they would all have gone the way of their comrade ABN Amro, which they don't want to do. And second and probably more importantly, it is a great scam for them. For this scheme creates tremendous trading opportunities because it is a controlled manipulation by the bullion banks.
We believe that in practice this uses the balance sheet of the Fed and possibly the BIS. The Comex features at strategic times during the day when gold is hammered lower. Now happens during New York Stock Exchange trading time. GLD, which has to trade by in lockstep with the paper gold price, goes down as well. Once the bullion banks are happy with having gotten GLD to the stress level of their choosing, they gobble up their shares in denominations of 100,000 each, about $12 million each, so we are not talking about retail being able to play this game.
Most institutions aren't interested in doing this but the bullion banks are, which is why over 30 percent of the physical bullion of GLD is already gone in 2013 alone. So when they are happy with creating a highly distressed price that is attractive to them, they buy up the shares at GLD and they contact Bank of New York Mellon, which is the fund's trustee, and they ask the bank to cancel their shares and put in notice of physical delivery of gold from HSBC, which is exactly what happens.
Then that gold leaves London and often travels out here, either directly into Shanghai or into China through Hong Kong, and all the data that is available confirms what I am saying. For instance Hong Kong publishes -- China does not – line items for both exports and imports every month to and from Hong Kong. So we actually have very good data on the elevated levels of gold that is re-exported out of Hong Kong into China. The biggest customers are the People's Bank of China, it goes to major jewelers like Chow Tai Fook that are doing a booming business, it goes to the Shanghai Gold Exchange, and so forth.
SCHALL: If you were calling the shots at the Deutsche Bundesbank, would you withdraw all German gold from New York and London?
KAYE: My presumption is that that gold isn't there. To satisfy any demands by the Bundesbank, the gold would have to be borrowed from somewhere else. It would have to be borrowed from the inventories that do exist, even though they are very low, at the Comex. It would have to be borrowed from JP Morgan, et al., and these guys hardly have enough gold for their own day-to-day purposes. So I am pretty skeptical that that would succeed and there are powerful reasons for believing that the Bundesbank already knows this.
These Central Banks talk to each other all the time and this is world-known and anyone can look to the WikiLeaks cables to confirm that. It is almost unfathomable that the Bundesbank would not know what the situation is. Now that leads to a second question: Why are they propagating this myth? The Bundesbank is not in the dark and they are not being lied to. And the officials there -- at least the senior officials -- know or should know what the real state of the world is and that the gold is gone while they are playing this game with the German people.
And the answer is that they don't know what else to do. They, like the Fed, have an incentive to manage the price of gold. They don't want any more stresses on the euro. And certainly gold going through the roof, as it did in 2011 when the euro was last under enormous stress, is not something that the Bundesbank wants. So I suspect that they are playing this game not because they want to lie to the German people. I think they are playing this game because they really don't know what else to do.
SCHALL: And so they pretend in this confidence game that it will take seven years to repatriate 300 tons of gold from the New York Fed?
KAYE: Tthat is right and that itself points to the notion that they aren't serious about getting their gold back. Because why should it take seven years? It makes no sense. This quantity of gold could be delivered in less than seven weeks. It already should be back in Germany. If they were serious about getting it back and believe that they could get it back -- let's couple those two concepts because I think they are critical -- it may very well be that you have got well-meaning officials at the Bundesbank who, if they honestly believed that they could get the gold back in seven weeks, they would have insisted on seven weeks. So this is just another interesting point in the direction of the arguments I am making.
SCHALL: Now that there is a price smackdown, what are your thoughts on the fact that the big banks in the United States are now going long gold in the futures market?
KAYE: I think they have been very successful in managing this enormous manipulation. And for people who, like me, feel that all the evidence supports the notion that this is a bullion bank-engineered manipulation, this is very positive for the future price of gold. They have profited enormously from shorting gold, going back particularly to mid-April, when they became very serious, and now they have turned from being very net short to at least being somewhat net long. This is shown not only in the commitment of traders report; it is also shown in a much more constructive series of options.
You need to understand that the bullion banks have been profiting on the way down in multiple ways. They profited by shorting, for instance, the Comex gold contract and the SPDR Gold Trust trade on the New York Stock Exchange. They have also made money buying puts and selling calls on gold, knowing which direction gold was going to trade next. And of course that direction has been almost always down since April. This has generated enormous trading profits for these banks. JP Morgan, I think, reported 100 per cent profitable trading days and this [gold manipulation] would certainly account for the fact that they would have had 100 per cent profitable trading days on their proprietary desks. The same with Goldman Sachs and on and on.
Having run a proprietary desk for a number of years, I can tell you that that is not possible outside a rigged game, even a casino. I know the people at the Wynn Macau casino pretty well and I have talked to them and casinos are about as rigged as you can get, but a casino does have the appearance of randomness and chance to it. Even a casino like Wynn, basically one day out of roughly three or four, will have a losing day. Somebody will get lucky at the baccarat table even though the game would not be offered if the casino did not have a very large margin in its favor.
Taking "risk" on its proprietary trading desk JP Morgan has a better streak than Wynn Macau. You logically cannot account for that unless the game itself is rigged. And the bullion banks, I am alleging, are responsible for rigging the game in their favor and this is why they are immensely profiting.
Now the reason the Fed would be happy with this is you can also do this as a back-door method of recapitalization at these bullion banks. It wasn't that long ago -- in 2008, 2009 -- that we had a very controversial bailout directly by the Fed and Treasury Department in the United States of these banks. No one wants to see -- at least no one in a position of power and no one at the bullion banks -- a repeat of that controversial history and of course politically it would be very contentious.
Much better to engage in a bailout that is invisible to the vast majority of people. So you can view what is going on here in as a stealth recapitalization or further bailout of these same banks, only the public is not aware of it.
http://www.gata.org/node/12801 Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | re / réserves de la FED
par marie Mer 2 Avr 2014 - 15:42 | |
| re / réserves de la FED
c'est long, et l'introduction est longue, mais ça vaut le coup : en résumé les USA ont exporté plus d'or qu'ils n'en ont importé, et le déficit représente en gros 5000 tonnes d'or, qui ne peuvent venir que de la FED,
La Chine est le principal bénéficiaire de ces exportations
en Avril, la Chine va annoncer le montant de ses réserves officielles , et ce sera le choc... Marie Pas de copier-coller: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Skipper
Inscription : 05/02/2005
Messages : 20139
| | | | |
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | | |
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | En trouduction google, parce que ça vaut le coup que les non anglophones le pigent quand même....
par g.sandro Dim 15 Oct 2017 - 21:30 | |
| L'article original : http://www.silver-phoenix500.com/gold-barsgold-rush-russia-stockpiling-bullion-theres-no-tomorrowLes lingots d'orGold Rush: la Russie Stockage des lingots comme il n'y a pas de lendemain Moscou (15 oct) La Banque centrale de Russie a récemment acheté des lingots à un rythme sans précédent. Selon l'expert financier argentin Gabriel Rubinstein, cette politique vise à protéger l'économie russe en cas de crise, y compris contre les «manipulations» liées aux dollars des États-Unis. "Les pays stockent de l'or pour des raisons stratégiques et défensives, par exemple, au cas où les relations entre les nations seraient endommagées et leur monnaie perdrait sa valeur", a déclaré à Rubens Mundo, Gabriel Rubinstein, consultant financier et ancien représentant de la Banque centrale de l'Argentine. S'il y a une telle situation, selon l'expert, les réserves d'or constitueraient la base d'une nouvelle monnaie ou d'autres actifs de valeur à l'avenir. "L'or, cette ressource financière éternelle, a une valeur réelle par rapport à d'autres actifs financiers.Le gouvernement russe estime qu'il est préférable d'avoir plus de ressources en or que les dollars.En théorie, si la Russie détient des tonnes de dollars américains et les Etats-Unis ont voulu endommager son économie, cela serait possible grâce à des manipulations de devises ", a déclaré Rubinstein, ajoutant que l'or garantit contre un tel scénario. Fabrication d'or à Ekaterinbourg, Russie © Sputnik / Pavel Lisitsyn La Sberbank russe prévoit d'augmenter ses approvisionnements en or en Chine La Banque centrale russe a considérablement augmenté le rythme de ses achats d'or. Entre janvier et septembre 2017, le régulateur a acheté 4,2 millions d'onces troy du métal précieux d'une valeur de plus de 5 milliards de dollars, soit 15% de plus qu'à la même période de l'année dernière. Au 1er octobre, la banque centrale russe détenait 73,6 milliards de dollars de réserves d'or, contre 65,5 milliards de dollars il y a un an, selon ses données. La Russie a augmenté ses achats de lingots après l'imposition des sanctions par les États-Unis et l'Union européenne après le référendum de 2014 en Crimée et le début d'un conflit militaire dans l'est de l'Ukraine. Depuis lors, selon le World Gold Council, la Banque centrale de Russie a augmenté ses réserves d'or d'environ 100 tonnes tous les six mois, soit plus que toutes les autres banques centrales du monde. À l'heure actuelle, la Russie est le septième plus grand détenteur de lingots d'or et, si le rythme actuel de ses achats d'or se poursuit, il devrait atteindre la sixième place, dépassant la Chine avec ses réserves actuelles de 1 842 tonnes. Au cours de la dernière décennie, la Banque centrale russe a modifié sa politique de gestion des réserves d'or et de devises, notamment en réduisant la part de l'euro de 40 à 26% et en portant ses réserves d'or de 8 milliards de dollars à 73,6 milliards de dollars. SputnikInternational Silver is king, Go Gold !
G.Sandro pas de copier collé: merci de faire un lien vers ce post. Suivez Hardinvestor sur Twitter et sur Facebook |
|
Captain
Inscription : 04/02/2005
Messages : 14460
| | | | |
| | | |
Sujets similaires | |
|
| Page 2 sur 3 | Aller à la page : 1, 2, 3 | | | | Permission de ce forum: | Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
| |
| |
; | |
Hardinvestor
Accueil 
Edito 
crane 
» Les Podcast et interviews de David Brady, Sprott, Rick Rule, Katusa, Bix Weir, etc...SILJ (Hardin mini-fonds Silver Juniors et Royalties)
» TREASURY METALS PFS publiée
» COMSTOCK MINING Inc. (NYSE : LODE) Fil dédié:
» a quoi joue la Russie ..
» Energies "propres" et renouvelables, batteries, véhicules électriques, fil dédié.
» fondamentaux de l'argent métal / décryptage de la désinformation
» Alain Juillet (que je découvre) une capacité d'analyse et de synthèse en raréfaction.
» Argent (SILVER) / analyses techniques